Game Development Reference
In-Depth Information
Packed Ptex also incurs higher runtime cost than conventional texture mapping.
Memory costs can actually be lower relative to conventional texturing, depending
primarily on the per-face texture resolution, filter kernel width, and the savings
relative to the waste inherent with conventional texture atlases. Although packed
Ptex can be applied to many different texture types, the most promising is prob-
ably displacement mapping, where the relative overhead is lower and the benefit
of seamlessness is greatest.
2.9
Acknowledgments
The techniques described here were developed in collaboration with Sujeong Kim
and Justin Hensley. Tim Heath, Abe Wiley, Exigent and Zoic helped on the art
side. This work was done under the management and support of Jason Yang and
David Hoff. Sujeong Kim, Takahiro Harada and Christopher Oat all provided
valuable feedback in writing this article.
Bibliography
[Apodaca and Gritz 99] Anthony A. Apodaca and Larry Gritz. Advanced Ren-
derMan:
Creating CGI for Motion Picture , First edition.
San Francisco:
Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., 1999.
[Burley and Lacewell 08] Brent Burley and Dylan Lacewell. “Ptex: Per-Face
Texture Mapping for Production Rendering.” In Proceedings of the Nine-
teenth Eurographics conference on Rendering , pp. 1155-1164. Aire-la-Ville,
Switzerland: Eurographics Association, 2008.
[McDonald 12] John McDonald. “Practical Ptex for Games.” Game Developer
Magazine 19:1 (2012), 39-44.
[McDonald and Burley 11] John McDonald, Jr and Brent Burley. “Per-face Tex-
ture Mapping for Real-Time Rendering.” In ACM SIGGRAPH 2011 Talks ,
article no. 10. New York: ACM, 2011.
[Purnomo et al. 04] Budirijanto Purnomo, Jonathan D. Cohen, and Subodh Ku-
mar. “Seamless Texture Atlases.” In Proceedings of the 2004 Eurographic-
s/ACM SIGGRAPH Symposium on Geometry Processing , pp. 65-74. New
York: ACM, 2004.
 
Search Nedrilad ::




Custom Search